Very sporadic parity errors - need to capture evidence to find and fix

TYPEWRITER DIAGNOSTIC RANDOM PARITY ERROR WITH BIT 10 FALSELY DETECTED

I snapped a picture of a parity error stop that popped up randomly while the typewriter diagnostic was running. The 1130 was fetching the next instruction to execute from location x0258, which you can see from the Storage Address Register (SAR) in row 2. The process of fetching the instruction causes the Instruction Address Register (IAR) in row 1 to be bumped up by 1, which is why it shows x0259. 

The data read from memory is in the third row, the Storage Buffer Register (SBR), with xC220 showing. Looking at the listing for the diagnostic monitor running the typewriter diagnostic, at location x0258 is a LD 2,0 instruction - load from the address in index register 2 plus a displacement of 0. This would be xC200 but we have bit 10 turned on incorrectly. 

Each half of the memory word has its own parity bit which is set so that the total number of 1 bits in the half of a word plus that parity bit must be an odd number (odd parity). The left half has bits 0, 1 and 6 turned on, an odd number, so parity bit P1 is off (middle section of the display panel). The right side shows bit 10 on (the error) which would be an odd number of 1 bits put the parity bit P2 is set - triggering the parity stop. 

When the data in that location was originally being written as xC200 the right halfword had no bits set thus it needed parity bit P2 set to achieve an odd total. Somehow the data read back had bit 10 also set to 1. This could happen in the write or during the read. Alternatively, something else can inject a 1 bit at the time that the read is occurring in spite of the data from memory bit 10 coming back as 0.  

When originally written, the parity bit P2 is set but some error in the core memory might stick in a 1 in bit 10, because bit 10 is not inhibited to store a 0 value.  Core memory cycles always have a read phase followed by a write phase. Any bit that has a 1 value will cause a sense pulse during the read.

DETAILS OF THE MEMORY AND SBR CIRCUITRY

During read, all cores in the word are flipped to zero and any that had previously been set to 1 cause a pulse to come out of the sense amplifiers and into the SBR register. During write, any bit that should remain a 0 has a current passed through the inhibit wire, otherwise it will be flipped to 1 during the write phase. 

Failures in the inhibit or sensing function of core memory might cause the random false 1 bit to appear. 

Parity checking and setting are done with the SBR register. The SBR is the source of data for the inhibit wires during a write phase. It is the destination for sense pulses during a read phase. 

In addition, the structure of the SBR register circuitry has a number of pulses that could set bit 10 to a 1 value. These include transfers from the IAR register, from input output devices during XIO instructions, from the Accumulator (ACC) register during address computations, and the sense pulses coming for a read phase in core memory. A possible failure would be no sense pulse but one of the other pulses incorrectly arriving to set the SBR bit 10 to 1. 

SETTING UP A LOGIC ANALYZER TO CAPTURE AND FREEZE AT A PARITY STOP

I chose to use my DS Logic USB based logic analyzer to try to capture the cause of bit 10 being incorrectly set to 1. I only have 16 channels on the device so I can't record all relevant information - contents of the full 16 bit SBR, the 13 bits of the SAR that address the 8K of memory, as well as the pulses going into the SBR to set any of the 16 bits. 

I therefore will hope that these sporadic errors are always a falsely hot bit 10 and set up the signals to determine when/how that is occurring. I will monitor the parity stop flipflop and trigger the analyzer to stop when it is set. The trigger will be placed at the end of the buffer so that I can watch the signals that led up to the error. 

The IBM 1130 uses many asynchronous pulses, not aligned with the clock edges, which includes the sense pulses and the various pulses that set the SBR. I thus can't use a traditional logic analyzer mode that records the state only at a common clock edge. Fortunately the DS Logic analyzer can record such unclocked signals. It can also deal with the 0 and +3V signal levels of an 1130 system. 

IBM 1130 typewriter (console printer) repair and adjustment - part 12 - completed!

FREEING UP THE CYLINDERS ON THE SCREW LINKS

I pulled out my Nye clock oil and applied it to the screw link and hollow metal cylinder around it that was binding on certain tab and carrier return solenoid activations. After moving the cylinder and link by hand many times, I ensured that everything was moving freely as it should.

RERUNNING DIAGNOSTIC AND SEEING PROPER BEHAVIOR ON THE TESTS

I ran the diagnostics to get a complete clean run as a proof that the console printer (typewriter) is working properly.

I was happy with the results and could consider the typewriter to be back to operating condition. 

REINSTALL IN THE MACHINE

I had to remove the front panel of the typewriter to reattach the CES (console entry switches) subassembly. The front panel was then placed back on the typewriter and all the covers put back in place. This involves detaching and reattaching the tab set/clear pushrod. 

The signal and power lines run through one heavy cable that I had to route down through the machine as I sat the typewriter on its stand atop the 1130. The cables were re-plugged into the SMS signal and power connector blocks.

You can see the heavy grey cable wrapped around the usage meter block and then routed downward towards the SMS connectors. I then put the bottom cover on the typewriter in preparation for its placement back on the 1130 system. 

Ready to reinstall

The typewriter was nestled back in its normal position, below the console light display pedestal and behind the keyboard. A quick check showed that the typewriter was working. 

I can now get back to my Virtual 2315 Cartridge Facility checkout, because I can see the output of the diagnostic programs on the console printer. 

IBM 1130 typewriter (console printer) repair and adjustment - part 11

TEST AGAIN WITH DIAGNOSTIC

I loaded the console printer/keyboard diagnostic into core memory and began its execution. This runs through several routines to test the printer as long as the Console/Keyboard switch on the 1130 console is set to Console. It prints each in black first, then in red:

• Carrier Return typed at left and Tabulate typed at a selected tab stop
• shifted to lower case and typed all 44 characters
• shifted to upper case and typed all 44 characters
• printed one row first typing +, then backspacing and printing a 0
• tabbed to the stop, backspaceed, then printed BACK SPACE
• printed INDEX by tabbing and typing one character per line for form vertical word
• returned, typed CARRIER RETURN, then spaced to activate the automatic return at end of line
• for each rotary position (column of the typeball), printed the row in sequence from tilt 0 to tilt 3
• for each row of the ball, printed all 11 characters in sequence from -5 to +5
• printed characters selected to have maximum change in tilt and rotate between each letter

The goal is to have the output appear as below (other than seeing black and red color):

OBSERVATIONS OF THE DIAGNOSTIC OUTPUT

The diagnostic expects a single tab to be set at column 40 to achieve the output shown above. The instructions from my copy of the diagnostics manuals asserts column 20 instead. 

The output of most of the tests was perfect, but I did see a couple of cases where movement functions didn't trigger properly. 

In the test segments above, the lower case side of the typeball missed a carrier return before it printed the row in red ink. It then successfully did the following test,  typing 0 and asterisks in a pattern involving spacing and backspacing, which stresses the alignment of the carrier rack and precision of the space and backspace movements. However, the next test, which should have proved out line feed and backspacing, failed. 

The failure was the lack of the initial tab movement, after which it should have backspaced, typed E, backspaced twice, typed C, backspaced another two times and typed A, and so forth, to spell out BACKSPACE in reverse from the column where the tab stopped. Similarly, it should have tabbed and did a line feed before typing each letter in INDEX. 

I reran the test but tried to hit the TAB button on the front of the typewriter to force it to take place. I didn't get it perfectly but you can see that I got part of BACK SPACE to print showing how it should look if tab had occurred. 

The remaining tests all worked properly - proving out the automatic carrier return/line feed when the carrier passes the end of line setting, then printing characters in three stressful patterns termed rock, roll and twist. It provides that character selection when typing is working right even in the most difficult circumstances. 

SUSPECTING STALE LUBRICATION IS CAUSING THE SPORADIC TAB AND CR FAILURES

When I first freed up the tab function, I had to manually rotate the hollow metal cylinder that should move freely on the screw link between the armature and the tightening nut. It worked properly for a while and then failed again during the backspace/index test. 

I had flushed out the old lubricants during the entire restoration to get the typewriter working properly. The oil turned to gum plus it absorbed dust to further solidify. I had to use extremely thin clock oil to seep under the solidified stale lubricant then move each part to get it freely moving. 

I suspect that stale lubricant in the hollow shaft of the metal cylinders is causing sporadic binding. I will have to carefully flush these out to make them slide up and down without resistance. 

Scope on typewriter feedback signals to verify timings and adjustments of the typewriter

BACK AFTER EXTENDED ROAD TRIP

I have been away from the shop for two weeks while my wife and I visited relatives and friends in Myrtle Beach South Carolina and Wilmington North Carolina. Along the way we spent a few days visiting Savannah Georgia for sightseeing. A quick jaunt to Raleigh North Carolina to visit a bar famous for elaborate Bloody Mary drinks rounded out the journey. 

UNUSUAL DIAGNOSTIC CODE RAISED QUESTION ON TIMING

The new version of the typewriter diagnostic combines more than one movement command for the typewriter into a single output instruction (XIO Write), something that isn't discussed in any of the 1130 system manuals or that I have found in any other programs. This combined movement might result in a momentary rising edge on the -Twr CB Response signal before it drops again until all movements were complete. It might cause a falling edge on the +Twr CrLfT Interlock signal in the midst of an operation. If either happens, the edge would trigger a premature completion of the operation, allowing a new XIO Write to be issued while the mechanisms in the typewriter are still in motion.  

FEEDBACK SIGNALS ON THE TYPEWRITER

The two feedback signals are implemented with strings of microswitches. Some movements, such as spacing or backspacing, activate a single switch. Carrier return and tab movements are not only long operations, but vary in duration based on how many columns are traversed. Therefore, each of those two types have a pair of microswitches that overlap to cover the entire duration of the movement. If the pair of microswitches are not properly adjusted, they might open a brief interval where movement appears to have completed, leading to issues when a program issues a new XIO Write prematurely. 

The -Twr CB Response signal is formed with three microswitches in series. One covers the Space/Backspace/Tab operational clutch, the other two cover typing one character and shifting between upper and lower case hemispheres of the typeball. When any activates, the signal drops to 0 and then rises back to +48V when the switch closes. 

The +Twr CrLfT Interlock signal is formed by four microswitches in parallel. It rises to +12V when any switch is activated and drops back to 0 when none of them is turned on. One switch covers the 360 degree rotation of the CR/Index operational clutch, during the time that this either latches up a carrier return or moves the platen in a line feed. Another switch covers the latching of the tab movement during the 180 degree rotation of the Space/Backspace/Tab operational clutch. A third switch is on the latched carrier return mechanism, so that from the time it begins moving leftward until the latch is released by striking the left margin, the switch is active. Finally, a switch covers the movement part of a tab. Tab movement continues for a variable number of columns, between the start point and the next set tab stop, so it has a microswitch that turns on as the carrier begins to slide rightward and turns off when it comes to a stop.

INVOLVEMENT OF SWITCHES IN MOVEMENTS

With the paired commands, there can have more than two switches involved. For example, if a backspace is combined with a carrier return, three switches participate and both signals send status. With a simple operation like typing a character, only the -Twr CB Response will be involved.  

Since Carrier Return (CR) movement continues depending on how many columns it has to pass while moving, two microswitches control the +Twr CrLfT Interlock signal.  The reason that a CR has a pair of microswitches is that we have one mechanism that is busy during the 360 degree rotation of the CR/Index operational clutch, which is the time needed to latch up the CR mechanism and then the second switch is active until the latch is released. 

 The reason that Tab has a pair of microswitches is that we have one mechanism that is busy during the 180 degree rotation of the Space/Backspace/Tab operational clutch. That covers the time needed to latch the pawls out of the way so the carrier can slide rightward. The latch of the pawls sets the second microswitch, so that it is only when the latch is released by banging into the set tab stop that we turn off that switch. 

There is a switch on the Space/Backspace/Tab operational clutch, which participates in the -Twr CB Response signal, but another microswitch on the linkage that sets the tab latch. The second switch participates in the +Twr CrLfT Interlock signal. Thus during a Tab, both signals are active but start and stop at different times with some overlap. No other operation on the typewriter affects both signals - they activate one or the other depending on the operation type. 

SCOPE OBSERVATIONS

I set up a manual XIO Write instruction to trigger the different movement commands, both individually and in the combinations seen in the diagnostic code. For each I observed the feedback signals on the oscilloscope. I compared those to the expected signal shape for each operation to identify where there are any switches that are maladjusted. 

I found that the individual write commands were working as expected for most movement types, but that the tab and space movements were not activating on the typewriter. The feedback signals were correct for all the working movement types. I didn't initially try the combined movements from the diagnostic as I wanted to get the individual types all working correctly before doing any combinations. 

The yellow trace is the XIO Write to the typewriter of a carrier return movement, the blue trace is the busy condition signal and the purple trace is the +Twr CrLfT Interlock signal showing that the return movement is underway. By comparison, an XIO Write for a tab or space showed busy but neither the purple +Twr CrLfT Interlock nor the green -Twr CB Response signals move at all since no motion took place. 

INVESTIGATING FAILURE OF TAB AND SPACE COMMANDS

The circuits from the 1130 controller logic to the typewriter solenoids were observed. Each will be at +48V until the relevant XIO Write value pulls a solenoid line to ground. This should cause it to pull down on a trigger and activate the typewriter movement function. 

I saw the lines pulled to ground for both of the solenoids, yet the movement didn't trigger. One other thing I noticed was the duration of the grounded line to the solenoid was longer than the working solenoids such as carrier return. Of course, the feedback signals didn't change since the typewriter mechanism was not triggered to perform the tab or space. The difference in duration may be caused by the feedback signal arrival which might terminate the solenoid action; no feedback thus no termination. 

CHECKING OUT SOLENOID ACTION FOR SPACE AND TAB

I set up to watch the solenoids when I attempted to write a command to tab or space. I want to find the cause of the failure to trigger the movements. There are several possible causes, with the resolution depending on exactly why the motion is not triggered.

The movement starts with a trigger that releases the left operational clutch which rotates 180 degrees before latching back to a stop. The left clutch powers the space, tab and backspace movement functions. A right 360 degree clutch powers carrier return and line feed movements. 

The release of the clutch to allow it to turn is due to a trigger lever. 

The left operational clutch has three trigger levers, one each for tab, space and backspace. These trigger levers can be moved by two different types of mechanisms - pushbuttons and solenoids. On an ordinary Selectric typewriter, a third mechanism based on keylevers is used instead. The pushbutton on the front of the console printer is connected via a cable to trip the trigger.

The trigger is also pulled down to activate the clutch by the operation of a solenoid. When it is energized, the armature pulls down on a screw link that moves the trigger. 

Thus, the failure of the tab and the space triggers to activate the left operational clutch could be caused by several causes. The solenoid might be mechanically jammed and thus not move its armature down. The screw link might not move the trigger down far enough to cause the operational clutch to release. The cable from the pushbutton might be holding the trigger up so that the solenoids pull doesn't result in enough trigger movement to trip the clutch. 

We know that the pushbuttons are triggering the tab and the space functions. We know that the backspace command from an XIO Write will trip the clutch and cause a backspace. What is failing is XIO write to request tab or space. I therefore watched to see what the solenoid activation did on this machine. Did the armature move? Did the screw link pull the trigger down? Is the cable from the pushbuttons stopping the trigger from moving down to trip the clutch?

ADJUSTMENTS MADE TO CORRECT THE ANOMALIES

Having found the root cause, I worked on a fix. It was important that both pushbuttons and solenoids worked for the two movements in question - tab and space - so I had some checking to do after each change. 

The magnet unit above supports tab, backspace and line feed at the top row, space and carrier return at the bottom row. The armatures are arranged to form a line across the middle, with screw links up to the triggers for the tab, space, backspace, carrier return and line feed in that order left to right.

The screw links were adjusted to allow the armature to start moving before it pulled on the trigger yet move far enough to ensure it did trigger. That worked for the space function but I still had issues with the tab. 

The screw link passes through a hole in the armature, then there is a metal cylinder under the armature and surrounding the screw link. Finally a nut at the bottom adjusts the length of the screw link. The metal cylinder has a gap on each side - armature and nut - which allows the armature to get up to speed before it starts pulling down on the screw link .

I adjusted the screw links for the two solenoids that were malfunctioning until they seemed to be reliably triggering. I did find interactions with the pushbuttons, so that I had to reset those adjustments with the front panel in place on the typewriter. 

Finished checking and fixing up the diagnostic load file

FOUND ALL THE DIFFERENCES TO THE LISTING

I ended up with quite a few words that didn't match, although most of them are consistently different because of some corrupted test sequences towards the end of the code. Since the test sequences were a bit longer the address of data at the end of the program shifted, thus any instructions that referenced these locations did not agree with the listing. 

In addition to all the differences based on the shifted locations near the end, there was a single word that was incorrect - the value that caused our spurious error message. However, it was not just a matter of shifted locations for everything else. Some of the test sequences to be typed were alternatives to the code I discovered but seemed like it would accomplish the same purpose.

ALTERNATIVE TYPING SEQUENCES

The first deviations in test sequences began in the middle of the Backspace and Index test. This test begins by issuing a tab, then types backspace in reverse backing up from the tab column, then does a tab and types index with a line feed and backspace between each character so that it appears vertically on the page. 

The code I have in the file issues a character code that combines more than one control function in the same character, which isn't defined as valid in the programming documentation. Every control function has the low order bit set to 1. The other bits define which control function:

• 81 - carriage return
• 41 - tab
• 21 - space
• 11 - backspace
• 09 - shift to black
• 05 - shift to red
• 03 - line feed

Note that the functions above are a single bit set plus the low order one. My listing for the diagnostic accomplishes the index part of the Backspace and Index test by issuing an 11 then an 03, to backspace then linefeed. The load file has a single control character 13, which seems to combine the backspace and the line feed into a single command. 

Because the load file combines these commands, it is shorter by three words. That displaces all the sequences that follow (Auto Carrier Return, Rock, Roll and Twist) plus all the data and code that follows the sequences. One word was added to a data table, which consumes one of the three words that was gained by compressing pairs of movement commands into a single hybrid command such as line feed plus backspace. 

CORRECTED LOAD FILE FOR SINGLE CORRUPTED WORD

Since the typing sequences and related address shifting appear to be an intentional update made by IBM in order to fit a change in the same diagnostic test footprint, the only difference that seemed to matter was the constant for the desired Device Status Word (DSW). After the typewriter is commanded to type a character with an XIO Write instruction, while the mechanical operation is underway but before it completes. an XIO Sense Device should return a DSW that has both the busy and not ready bits set. The constant should have had both bits turned on, but it instead only had a bit for busy status. 

NEXT STEPS

With the file corrected, when I next arrive at the workshop I should be able to run the diagnostic without receiving the false error messages that were caused by the corrupted constant. I have some things to do that will delay my next visit to the shop, but once I am able to return I will load the fixed file and try out the typewriter.

I do have questions about the unorthodox combination commands that mix more than one movement command in the same XIO Write instruction. The reason I want to look closer is because the controller logic is sensitive to two feedback signals coming from the typewriter, which are -Twr CB Response and +Twr CrLfT Interlock, both of which are produced by multiple microswitches. 

Two of the typewriter movements, tab and carrier return, are variable duration events which depend upon pairs of microswitches to properly cover the entire duration. If the adjustments aren't correct, we could see a spurious edge on the signal that convinces the controller logic that the movement is complete even though the signal goes back to busy for additional time. 

I will put the oscilloscope on the two feedback signals and watch what occurs with the combination movement commands, hand coding an XIO Write to trigger the movement. If anything looks wonky, I will know the microswitch(es) to check and readjust. 

More on the errors with the console printer (typewriter) diagnostic

USED SCOPE TO VERIFY THAT NOT READY AND BUSY ARE PRESENT

I could clearly see that when an XIO Write was issued to the typewriter, both Busy and Not Ready activated at the same time and for the appropriate duration. I traced the Not Ready signal to every location in the machine just to satisfy myself there was no issue with the DSW. 

RAN DIAGNOSTIC AGAIN, THE SAVED DSW WAS CORRECT BUT ERROR PRINTED

Indeed, after an XIO Sense Device the Accumulator (ACC) had bits 3, 4 and 5 set, which stand for Console/KB switch set to Console, typewriter busy, and typewriter not ready, respectively. This is correct. 

The diagnostic printed error E0402 which indicated that our status was not correct. The text in the documentation suggests that the busy status was wrong, but it was just poorly worded. Nor was the Not Ready status wrong - as we just verified. The error message should not have been printed. 

STEPPING THROUGH TESTING CODE, I FOUND A CONSTANT WAS INCORRECT

The code involved in this producing this error message had immediately issued an XIO Sense Device after it did an XIO Write to type a character. I saw it apply some bit manipulation then check to see that the saved DSW matched the archetype for a correct status. However, the word with the archetype status, which should have held x0C00, was instead 0x0800. This was triggering the spurious error message. 

I did a quick update of that word to the proper value, reran the diagnostic and, miracle of miracles, the error message was no longer emitted. However, if there was one corrupted value, there may be more. 

COMPARING DIAGNOSTIC ASSEMBLY LISTING AGAINST CORE FILE

I began to check the value of each word in the file I load into core to run the diagnostic, comparing it to the printed listing of the diagnostic program. This is time consuming. So far, I have found the one error word that caused the erroneous error message, but also see that the address of one routine near the end of the listing is off by two words. However, every other word so far has matched perfectly. 

As I finish the cross check, I can clean up my diagnostic program file so that it will be loaded exactly as intended by the authors at IBM and therefore should run flawlessly. 

Substitute relay arrived for 2501 card reader, tested and installed

RELAY R3 HAD AN OPEN COIL THUS REPLACEMENT NEEDED

The power supply box includes a function to keep the main motor of the card reader running for 15 seconds after the 2501 receives its last read or feed request via an -execute command signal. Relay R3 latches every time -execute command arrives but the voltage across the coil declines based on an RC circuit until about 15 seconds have elapsed, when the relay coil is no longer able to hold the connection. 

The contacts of relay R3 send a signal -motor hold sw back to the 1130 system's controller logic, which uses it to maintain or drop the -motor relay command back to the reader. If this isn't working, the motor will shut off instantly after every card is read, which is hard on the motor and disruptive to the process of reading. 

EXACT PART NOT AVAILABLE BUT LOCATED A RELAY THAT SHOULD WORK PROPERLY

The Sigma part number did not come up in any online search, but there were many similar relays from Sigma that I could choose from. I looked for the critical specifications to get as close to the original relay as possible. This included the voltage and current rating of the contacts, the voltage for the coil, the DC resistance of the coil and factors like the drop out voltage. 

The original relay had contacts rated for 2A of current, but that is extremely far above the actual signal currents used in the 2501 and 1130 system. Thus, a 1A part was very suitable. The voltages for the contact, coil, and coil drop out were identical. The resistance of the original relay was 10K but the part I found was 9K. 

The final difference was the mounting method - the hole locations and shape of the mounting foot. I will have to adjust for the difference to install this new relay into the power supply box. 

CONNECTED AND TESTED ON THE WORKBENCH

I connected the power supply box to my 220V step up transformer and used some resistors and jumpers to simulate the control signal -execute command to trigger R3. My VOM was hooked across the contacts of the new relay to let me hear the duration of the relay actuation. The circuitry around the relay includes a potentiometer where I can fine tune the time duration, which should help me compensate for any differences due to the substitute relay.

The relay activated cleanly when the control signal was given. The relay opened up after 5.5 seconds. Based on that, I began adjusting the potentiometer but the max delay I could achieve was around 7 seconds. 

I experimented changing the resistance of the time adjustment leg - the potentiometer plus a 10K resistor - to see if I could lengthen the hold. Even with an infinite resistance, the relay held for 13 to 16 seconds, varying a bit, which I deemed close enough to proceed. The specification for motor hold time is 15 seconds +/- 3, therefore we are within the proper range. 

The potentiometer and related resistor are out of the circuit. The relay coil appears to be draining power faster than the original did, or it has a higher drop out voltage, or both. An alternative solution would be a larger capacitor in the timing circuit, which would accommodate the higher current flow and lower its voltage at a slower rate. However, since the unit performs adequately now, I won't pursue this alternative.

MODIFIED MOUNTING METHOD TO INSTALL INTO POWER SUPPLY BOX

The original relay had a rectangular plate on the back with holes near the top and bottom. The new relay has a different shape and hole pattern, thus I had to take off the plate from the old relay, drill out a hole and use a screw to attach the new relay to the plate. 

READY TO PUT POWER SUPPLY BOX BACK INTO 2501 CARD READER

The lower compartment of the 2501 card reader holds the power supply box, a card cage for the SLT circuits and the connectors used to connect cables to the 1130 system. The power supply box fits in the compartment using slots in the box that match mounting hardware in the 2501.

A flat rail runs across the top of the compartment, from front to back. Slots in the top of the power supply box allow it to fit over the rail, with enough room in the slot to move further upward than its final mounting position. 

That permits the bottom of the power supply box to be swung over the top of a rectangular rail that sits across the bottom of the compartment, running from front to back. Square cutouts on the bottom of the power supply box allow the box to settle down onto the rail. This suspends the box from moving side to side in the 2501. A bolt goes through the bottom of the power supply box to lock it down in position on the bottom of the 2501 compartment. 

Once I do this I will be reconnecting all the cables and wires I had to disconnect in order to move the power supply box to the bench for testing and repair.